Catch of the Day: Minimally Scientific Testing???

Date: November 1, 2013Author: Dan

hat tip to Charles Freeman – maybe this is why nobody is signing

3 thoughts on “Catch of the Day: Minimally Scientific Testing???”

Joe Veneroso says:

November 1, 2013 at 6:48 am

I suspect they inadvertently dropped the word “invasive” after “minimally”. Not the type of typo to inspire confidence in one’s competence.

Loading...
Ellie Jones says:

November 1, 2013 at 12:36 pm

This was definitely an error in the typing of the headline of the petition. The petition has been corrected to reflect minimally-INVASIVE, not minimally-scientific. The petition was updated a week ago and the word invasive was inadvertently omitted.

Loading...
Andy Weiss says:

November 2, 2013 at 8:58 am

It’s an obvious mistake. Perhaps they can edit to correct.

Loading...

Comments are closed.

Two Episcopalians Walk Into a Bar. One is a cradle churchgoer whose faith has wavered but never quite failed. The other is a scientist who spent his adult life as an atheist and has only recently, reluctantly, begun to believe. They order oysters. They start talking.

What follows is a conversation that lasted more than a year — about God and hiddenness, about miracles and what the word almighty actually means, about the Resurrection and whether it happened in the ways we imagine, about N.T. Wright and John Shelby Spong and Rowan Williams and why three bishops and scholars of the Anglican Communion can hold such strikingly different views about the same empty tomb.

Two Episcopalians Walk Into a Bar is not a theology textbook or a devotional. It is the kind of conversation that happens when two ordinary people — neither of them experts, both of them serious — decide to follow the hard questions wherever they lead. The Episcopal tradition has always made room for exactly this kind of inquiry: faith held with conviction and curiosity, doubt treated as a companion rather than an enemy.

Gerard Schiere on Why All The Anger in YouTube-ee-LandJuly 26, 2026
The divine is hidden in a way that humans not even know that they have passed already, being surrounded by…
Dan on Why All The Anger in YouTube-ee-LandJuly 24, 2026
Dear Jim, Thank you for your comment. I have read it four times now, and I will certainly read it…
James Carney on Why All The Anger in YouTube-ee-LandJuly 23, 2026
Dan, This is going to be my last comment on this topic (probably) because I'm old and have neither the…
Hemraj Fernando on Why All The Anger in YouTube-ee-LandJuly 23, 2026
Gospels say there was not enough time to give a proper burial. Ladies went early in the morning to give…
Anon on Why All The Anger in YouTube-ee-LandJuly 23, 2026
If you can’t prove Jesus was born you can’t prove the shroud is real. Think about that.

Shroud of Turin: Should You Believe It is Real?

For 20 years I believed it. I changed my mind. Let me explain.

Catch of the Day: Minimally Scientific Testing???

Like this:

Related

3 thoughts on “Catch of the Day: Minimally Scientific Testing???”

Shroud of Turin

Like this:

Related

3 thoughts on “Catch of the Day: Minimally Scientific Testing???”

Discover more from Shroud of Turin: Should You Believe It is Real?