Pilgrimage – Shroud of Turin: Should You Believe It is Real?

Two Episcopalians Walk Into a Bar. One is a cradle churchgoer whose faith has wavered but never quite failed. The other is a scientist who spent his adult life as an atheist and has only recently, reluctantly, begun to believe. They order oysters. They start talking.

What follows is a conversation that lasted more than a year — about God and hiddenness, about miracles and what the word almighty actually means, about the Resurrection and whether it happened in the ways we imagine, about N.T. Wright and John Shelby Spong and Rowan Williams and why three bishops and scholars of the Anglican Communion can hold such strikingly different views about the same empty tomb.

Two Episcopalians Walk Into a Bar is not a theology textbook or a devotional. It is the kind of conversation that happens when two ordinary people — neither of them experts, both of them serious — decide to follow the hard questions wherever they lead. The Episcopal tradition has always made room for exactly this kind of inquiry: faith held with conviction and curiosity, doubt treated as a companion rather than an enemy.

John L. on Is the Chemistry of the Shroud Image Settled?June 5, 2026
Mr. Porter, With regard to your #4, the "Intaglio Possibility" for the origin of the Shroud image, Otangelo Grasso has…
Stephen on The Notorious BishopJune 4, 2026
Thank you for the post. Initially I was worried that you might be considering that the Lord does not exist.…
Hemraj Fernando on What If We Asked Better Questions?June 2, 2026
The logical chain (simple and unavoidable) Radiation alters carbon‑14. The Shroud shows radiation signatures. Therefore the Shroud’s carbon‑14 was altered.…
Matthew Dorner on The Inexhaustible ClothMay 31, 2026
For a certain fiery and starry light shone from His eyes, and the majesty of the Godhead gleamed in His…
John L. on The Inexhaustible ClothMay 24, 2026
Mr. Porter, Your argument from the "Inexhaustibility" of the Universe to the Existence of a Creator God is intriguing, but…