A reader from Annapolis writes:
Five tweets from Max Patrick Hamon via this blog arrived while I was in line at Starbucks this AM. I like Max because his blogments usually fit in a single tweet or two. The barista wondered why I was laughing. There was no way to explain. Here be the tweets:
Archaeocryptologically speaking, the Shroud man image formation process implies “a contact and gradual loss of contact process”.
Such a process is consistent with the corpse (in hyperthermy or not) being tightly wrapped up into the Shroud soaked with ///
/// a watery solution and subjected to a fumigation. When will you consider the possibily, for God’s sake?
It is due to “a self-controlled or autoregulated mechabism”…
It is a physico-chemical reaction!
ROFLMAO!!! I will consider the possibility when I know what you are saying. What does archaeocryptologically mean? Is this image formation process you are talking about a hypothesis, theory or what? Is there some science behind it? Hey Max, you were going to provide a copy of the paper that was omitted from the proceedings at the Frascati conference. Can we expect it soon? I mean it was submitted, so can’t you just send it along by email?
Yes, reminds me of supercalifragilisticexpialadocious. If you say it loud enough you’ll always sound precocious.
I bought a book for my brother for Christmas. It’s titled, “The Superior Person’s Book of Words.” This book is so amusing I might keep it for myself… :)
I believe archaeocryptography is the study of ancient crytography, secret symbols etc; but that is all I found thru searching. Otherwise, I think I have a slight grasp of what Max might be implying but I’m not sure. I would really be interested if he could put forth that paper he mentioned and maybe explain to us his hypothesis of the image formation.(In laymens terms please).
Thanks,
R.
To the reader from Annapolis: Do you want me to rap it instead?
To AnnieCee: I am PRECISELY not writing for little girls who still believe in Santa Claus.!
So you think I’m somewhat acerebral, eh? Well, the author of the “Superior Person’s Book of Words” says that only wire-haired terriers are acerebral.
I am not saying at all you are acerebral. I just think you are a bit “oldchildish” when it comes to serious matters.
The reader from Annnapolis was “rolling on the floor laughing her/his ass off, laughing her/his ass off at my last blogment.
Now what if I am right?
I e-mailed Dan, the first 6 pages of my Torun paper (even before sending them to Aleksander Sztramski Toruń Acheiropoietos Conference 2011secretary). If Dan doesn’t want to publish them on his blog, it is his own right.