To Presenters and Conference Attendees

As the Shroud of Turin Conference convenes in St. Louis later this month, I want to extend my warmest wishes for what I’m certain will be a successful and enlightening gathering. I’m very impressed by the planning and the roster of speakers and presenters.

Though I regret that I cannot be there, my thoughts will be very much with the conference community. Having had the privilege of attending major Shroud conferences in 2005, 2008, and 2014, I know firsthand the unique energy and scholarly dedication that characterize these meetings. There is something truly special about bringing together so many researchers from diverse backgrounds—scientists, historians, theologians, and curious minds—all united by a shared fascination with one of history’s most enigmatic artifacts.

Over the years, these conferences and other meetings have given me the opportunity to form friendships that I treasure deeply. I think with particular fondness of past friends like Barrie Schwortz and Kim Driesbach, and current friends like Joe Marino and Giulio Fanti, whose constant passion for rigorous investigation and generous spirits have enriched this community immeasurably.

I want to acknowledge something that I believe strengthens—rather than weakens—our community: we don’t all reach the same conclusions. While my own analysis has led me to question the Shroud’s authenticity, I have tremendous respect for the careful work and sincere convictions of those who conclude otherwise. This community has consistently demonstrated that meaningful dialogue and mutual respect can flourish even—perhaps especially—when we approach the same evidence from different perspectives.

What I’ve always admired about Shroud conferences is the commitment to following the evidence wherever it leads, even when it challenges our preconceptions. This dedication to scholarly integrity, combined with the collegiality and good humor that characterize these gatherings, creates an environment where real learning can take place.

I look forward eagerly to reading the papers that emerge from this conference. Whether they present new scientific analyses, historical investigations, or methodological innovations, I’m confident they will advance our understanding and provide rich material for future discussions. The questions surrounding the Shroud—its age, composition, image formation, and historical significance—remain as compelling today as ever. I suspect this conference will generate new avenues of inquiry that will engage us for years to come.

Let me add a personal note: I am not, nor have I ever been, anti-Shroud or anti-authenticity. Anti implies predisposition. I have always been pro-Shroud in the sense of wanting more and more research. As for authenticity, I’m not sure what it means: Jesus’ burial shroud? A bier cloth relic, perhaps? Or, probably—as I see it—a work of craftsmanship more in line with the C-14 dating results. I stand in disagreement with most of you, but not in contention.

I’m confident this conference will uphold the high standards of scholarship and fellowship that have made these meetings so valuable to all of us. I look forward to continuing our conversations and debates in the months and years after the conference. It is a remarkable object that has captured our imagination and curiosity.

With warm regards and best wishes for a successful gathering and meaningful sharing,

Dan Porter (shroudstory.com)

P.S. Christ, the Prince of Peace — may His peace shape our prayers and our fellowship.