Response to Teddi Pappas

Teddi, that was a really good comment. You certainly give us something to think about. We might even probe some different AI machines to see what they “think.”.

You speak of errors in AI and the need to be cautious. I completely agree. It seems that there are two kinds of errors in AI:

1. Hallucinating: For instance, in creating a Curriculum Vitae for a job applicant who is underqualified for an advanced marketing position, ChatGPT has been known to fabricate a MBA and an internship for the applicant to better meet the requirements for the job.
2. Bias: The information used to train public AIs is biased in favor of those who are prolific–those who write books and papers vs. those who don’t (lawyers vs. plumbers). As such the conclusions tend to be more liberal (which suits me) which is unfair and unaccurate.

I don’t know how much this applies to the problem at hand. Clearly, as you will see below, there is a consensus that the 3 to 1 herringbone point more likely to medieval than 1st century.

I first asked Google’s Gemini two questions and tried to not be misleading.

• Is a three over one herringbone weaving pattern common? If so, where and when in history? And with what type of fabrics?
• Because the Shroud of Turin is a length of 3 over 1 herringbone patterned linen, is it, on that basis and that basis alone, more likely to be from the 1st century or the 14th century?

I then posed the identical questions to Open/AI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude/AI.

Gemini Response to Question 1:

The 3/1 herringbone weave pattern is indeed a known and used pattern, though perhaps not as ubiquitous as some simpler weaves. Here’s a breakdown of its history and use:

What is a 3/1 Herringbone?

• Twill Weave: Herringbone is a derivative of twill weaves, which are characterized by diagonal lines in the fabric. In a 3/1 twill, the weft thread goes over three warp threads and then under one.  
• Herringbone Effect: The “herringbone” pattern is created by reversing the direction of the twill at regular intervals, creating a distinctive V-shaped pattern that resembles the bones of a herring fish.

Historical Use:

• Ancient Times: While definitive proof is sometimes debated, there’s evidence suggesting 3/1 herringbone (or similar complex twills) existed in ancient times.
  • Shroud of Turin: The Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth believed by some to be the burial cloth of Jesus, exhibits a 3/1 herringbone weave. This has been a point of contention, with some arguing it’s inconsistent with first-century weaving technology, while others claim it’s plausible.  
  • Other Archaeological Finds: Some archaeological textile fragments from the Hallstatt period (800-400 BCE) in Austria show complex twill weaves that could be related to 3/1 herringbone.  
• Later Periods: Herringbone patterns, including 3/1 variations, have been used throughout history in various textiles, from clothing to upholstery.  

Fabrics:

• Linen: As seen in the Shroud of Turin, linen is a fabric that can be woven in a 3/1 herringbone pattern.  
• Wool: Wool is another common fiber for herringbone, particularly in heavier fabrics like tweed for coats and suits.
• Other Fibers: With modern technology, herringbone patterns can be woven in various fibers, including cotton, silk, and synthetic blends.  

Commonality:

While 3/1 herringbone isn’t the most common weave (simpler twills like 2/1 are more frequent), it’s certainly not rare or unheard of. Its use likely depended on factors like:

• Technological Capabilities: Weaving more complex patterns requires more advanced looms and weaving techniques.
• Desired Fabric Properties: The 3/1 twill creates a strong and durable fabric with a distinct texture, which might have been preferred for certain applications.
• Aesthetic Preferences: The herringbone pattern has a visually appealing and classic look that has been appreciated throughout history.

In conclusion, the 3/1 herringbone weaving pattern has a history that may stretch back to ancient times, with more concrete evidence from later periods. It has been used in various fabrics, particularly linen and wool, and while not the most common weave, it’s a known and historically significant pattern. Sources and related content

Gemini Response to Question 2:

The weave alone is not enough to definitively date the Shroud of Turin to either the 1st or 14th century. Here’s why:

• 3/1 Herringbone’s Historical Range: As discussed earlier, while not extremely common, 3/1 herringbone (or similar complex twills) has evidence suggesting its existence in both ancient times and later periods. This means the weave itself doesn’t exclusively point to one era.
• Weaving Technology: While more complex weaves might have been less common in earlier periods, they were not entirely impossible. Ancient weavers were highly skilled, and evidence suggests they could achieve sophisticated patterns.  
• Other Factors: Dating textiles involves considering multiple factors beyond the weave:
  • Fiber Analysis: Examining the type of linen used, its growth conditions, and processing methods.
  • Dye Analysis: If dyes are present, analyzing their composition can provide clues about the textile’s origin and age.  
  • Microscopic Examination: Looking for wear patterns, repairs, and other microscopic details.
  • Radiocarbon Dating: This scientific method measures the decay of carbon-14 isotopes to estimate the age of organic materials. However, its accuracy on the Shroud has been debated due to potential contamination and sampling issues.  

The Shroud’s Case:

• 1988 Radiocarbon Dating: The most famous radiocarbon dating in 1988 suggested a 14th-century origin for the Shroud.
• Ongoing Debate: However, this dating has been challenged by some scientists who argue that the samples tested might not have been representative of the original cloth due to repairs or contamination.
• Recent Research: Some recent studies, focusing on different aspects like fiber analysis and image analysis, have suggested a possible older origin for the Shroud.  

Conclusion:

While the 3/1 herringbone weave is a relevant piece of information, it’s not the sole determining factor for the Shroud’s age. It’s crucial to consider all available evidence, including scientific analysis, historical records, and other contextual information, to form a comprehensive understanding. The debate about the Shroud’s age continues, and the weave is just one piece of the puzzle.

ChatGPT’s Response to Question 1:

The three-over-one herringbone weaving pattern is not the most common herringbone structure, but it has historical significance and is used in specific contexts. Here’s an overview:

Herringbone Weave in General

Herringbone is a twill weave with a distinctive zigzag pattern. It alternates the diagonal direction of the twill, creating a broken effect that resembles the skeleton of a fish (hence the name).

The three-over-one (3/1) herringbone weave is a variation where three warp threads float over one weft thread before the direction of the diagonal is reversed. This creates a slightly more textured and pronounced pattern than a standard herringbone weave (usually 2/2).

---

Historical Use

The three-over-one herringbone pattern appears in historical textiles, especially in the following contexts:

1. Ancient Civilizations:
   • Early herringbone patterns have been found in Egyptian textiles and Roman mosaics, though these were more symbolic or structural than true 3/1 weave patterns.
   • True weaving patterns resembling herringbone became more common with the development of looms capable of producing complex twills.
2. Medieval Europe:
   • The herringbone weave, including variations like 3/1, became a staple in European woolen fabrics during the Middle Ages, particularly for garments like cloaks, tunics, and blankets.
   • It was valued for its durability and the way it held warmth, making it ideal for outerwear.
3. 18th and 19th Century:
   • In Ireland and Scotland, the pattern became popular in tweed fabrics. While 2/2 herringbone was more common, 3/1 variations occasionally appeared in bespoke or regional textiles.
   • Herringbone tweed, in all its variations, became synonymous with rustic, durable clothing.

---

Types of Fabrics

The three-over-one herringbone weave has been used in a variety of fabrics:

1. Wool:
   • Most commonly associated with herringbone, particularly in tweed and other heavy outerwear fabrics.
   • Wool fabrics with 3/1 herringbone were often used for tailored suits, coats, and upholstery.
2. Linen:
   • Less common, but found in lighter fabrics for summer garments or decorative uses in Europe.
3. Silk:
   • Occasionally used for luxury textiles or ceremonial garments, where the pronounced pattern was valued.
4. Cotton:
   • Used in 19th and 20th-century fabrics for workwear or casual apparel.

---

Modern Usage

The 3/1 herringbone weave continues to be used today, particularly in:

• Bespoke suits: For creating a more pronounced texture in woolen fabrics.
• Home textiles: Such as upholstery or decorative throws.
• Fashion garments: In both traditional and modern contexts where texture and pattern are desired.

This weave is less common than standard 2/2 herringbone but stands out for its bold texture, making it a choice for unique applications.

ChatGPT’s Response to Question 2:

Based solely on the fact that the Shroud of Turin is made of a 3-over-1 herringbone twill linen, it is more likely to be from the 14th century rather than the 1st century. Here’s why:

1. Weaving Technology and Patterns

• First Century (1st Century AD):
  • Weave Types: In the Near East during the 1st century, the most common linen weave was the plain weave (also known as tabby weave), where the weft thread crosses over and under each warp thread alternately.
  • Complex Weaves: While simple twill weaves existed, they were rare in linen textiles from this period and region. Twill weaves were more commonly used with wool rather than linen.
  • Herringbone Twill: There is no archaeological evidence of 3-over-1 herringbone twill linen fabrics from the 1st century in the Near East. The technology and looms required for such complex linen weaves were not prevalent.
• Fourteenth Century (14th Century AD):
  • Advancements in Weaving: By the Middle Ages, especially in Europe, weaving technology had advanced significantly. Looms capable of producing complex patterns like 3/1 herringbone twill were in use.
  • Herringbone Twill in Linen: The 3-over-1 herringbone twill weave became more common in European textiles during this time. Linen fabrics with such intricate patterns were produced for various uses, including clothing and ecclesiastical items.
  • Textile Trade: The 14th century saw a flourishing textile trade in Europe, with centers like Italy and Flanders known for high-quality linen and complex weaves.

2. Archaeological and Historical Evidence

• Lack of First Century Examples:
  • Archaeological Finds: Linen textiles recovered from 1st-century sites in the Near East are predominantly plain weave. Twill weaves, especially complex ones like 3/1 herringbone, are absent in the archaeological record for this period and region.
  • Weaving Techniques: The techniques and loom technology necessary for producing 3/1 herringbone twill in linen were not characteristic of the Near Eastern textile practices in the 1st century.
• Presence in the 14th Century:
  • Existing Textiles: Surviving medieval European textiles include examples of 3/1 herringbone twill weaves in linen.
  • Documentation: Historical documents from the 14th century reference complex weaving patterns and the trade of luxurious textiles featuring such designs.

3. Conclusion

Based on the weave pattern alone:

• More Likely 14th Century: The presence of a 3-over-1 herringbone twill weave in linen is consistent with European textile practices of the 14th century.
• Less Likely 1st Century: There is no supporting evidence that such a complex weave in linen existed in the Near East during the 1st century.

Additional Notes

• Radiocarbon Dating: While not part of the question’s basis, it’s worth noting that radiocarbon dating conducted in 1988 dated the Shroud to between 1260 and 1390 AD, aligning with the 14th century.
• Weaving Technology Evolution: The evolution of loom technology allowed for more intricate patterns over time. The 3/1 herringbone twill is a product of such advancements not present in earlier centuries in the Near East.

---

Summary: Considering only the fact that the Shroud of Turin is made of 3-over-1 herringbone twill linen, it is more plausible that it originated in the 14th century rather than the 1st century. This conclusion is based on the historical development of weaving techniques and the archaeological evidence of textile patterns from those periods.

Claude’s Response to Question 1:

The 3/1 herringbone structure creates a distinctive zigzag pattern where the warp threads pass over three weft threads and under one. This creates longer floats (the parts of the yarn that “float” over multiple crossing threads) compared to simpler weaves. What makes this particularly interesting is how these floats reverse direction at regular intervals, creating the characteristic zigzag.

In medieval Europe, we see this pattern appearing frequently in areas with strong wool-working traditions. For instance, there’s evidence of its use in:

• Yorkshire, England, where fulled wool fabrics using 3/1 herringbone were produced for winter garments
• The Low Countries (modern-day Netherlands and Belgium), where it was used in high-quality wool broadcloth
• Northern Italy, particularly in Florence’s textile industry during the 14th-15th centuries

The pattern’s popularity in wool fabrics wasn’t just aesthetic – it served several practical purposes:

1. The longer floats created better insulation by trapping more air between the layers
2. The structure allowed for denser fulling (a finishing process where wool fabric is compressed and felted), creating weather-resistant cloth
3. The directional pattern helped shed water more effectively than plain weaves

In terms of fabric qualities, 3/1 herringbone typically required:

• Strong, well-prepared yarns that could handle the tension of longer floats
• Careful tension control during weaving to maintain pattern consistency
• Skilled weavers who could manage the more complex treadling sequence

The pattern fell somewhat out of favor with the rise of mechanized weaving in the Industrial Revolution, as simpler 2/1 structures were easier to produce on early power looms. However, it experienced a revival in the late 19th/early 20th century men’s suiting trade.

Regarding the Roman usage, archaeological finds from military sites along Hadrian’s Wall and in other Roman frontier regions have revealed wool textiles with 3/1 herringbone patterns. These were typically in heavier weight fabrics, suggesting use in military cloaks (sagum) and other outdoor garments.

This is a specialized area of textile archaeology and historical weaving, so while I’ve tried to be accurate, I should note that some of these details might benefit from verification against primary sources or archaeological reports.

Claude’s Response to Question 2:

Based solely on the 3/1 herringbone weave pattern in linen, the textile is more consistent with 14th century European production, particularly from France or Italy, than with 1st century Middle Eastern textile traditions.

Here’s why:

The 3/1 herringbone was a relatively sophisticated and complex weaving pattern that required an advanced loom setup. While not impossible in the 1st century, it was much more characteristic of medieval European textile production, particularly in areas like France and Italy where complex linen weaving was well-established by the 14th century.

First century Middle Eastern linen textiles, based on archaeological findings, typically featured simpler weave structures. When herringbone patterns were used, they were more commonly 2/1 rather than 3/1 structures.

Additionally, the width of the Shroud (approximately 1.1 meters) is more consistent with medieval European looms than with the typically narrower looms used in 1st century Middle Eastern textile production.

However, this is just one technical aspect of a complex object. Many other factors would need to be considered for any broader conclusions about the Shroud’s origins, such as flax preparation methods, thread spinning techniques, and other physical and chemical characteristics. The weave pattern alone cannot definitively date the object.

My Gut Feeling

We don’t know enough, individually, collectively or algorithmically to draw solid conclusions from the weave. Like plant images and pollen, this is probably a dead end.