Site icon Shroud of Turin Blog

Stupid Comment of the Day

imageIn a screen-scraper blog (plagiarizes articles from other blogs in order to sell advertising, a form of spam), in a comment to an article about the Piltdown Man, someone who calls himself Secular Humanist says:

Piltdown Man is the Atheist version of the Shroud of Turin. Both are fakes.
So, you see? Both sides have histories of faking evidence. In any case, one piece of false evidence hardly invalidates the massive amount of empirical, solid, evidence supporting Evolution.

What is he saying? That false evidence about the Shroud hardly invalidate Christianity or religion? Oh, what evidence is that that was faked? What about the massive amount of empirical, solid, evidence about the Shroud’s authenticity?

See: Atheists Answer Only, Please.? Nature Smell

Exit mobile version