Piltdown Man is the Atheist version of the Shroud of Turin. Both are fakes.
So, you see? Both sides have histories of faking evidence. In any case, one piece of false evidence hardly invalidates the massive amount of empirical, solid, evidence supporting Evolution.
What is he saying? That false evidence about the Shroud hardly invalidate Christianity or religion? Oh, what evidence is that that was faked? What about the massive amount of empirical, solid, evidence about the Shroud’s authenticity?
See: Atheists Answer Only, Please.? Nature Smell