Adam writes:
Media hype aside Hawking has said nothing new in this latest statement. But it’s naive theology which places God in a creation situation requiring a before and after – ‘time’ as we know it is a creation too.
I could not agree more. In fact, it is naive philosophy and probably naive theoretical physics.
The more universes, the more they are characterized as everlasting without beginning or end, the greater must be the creator God.
Stephen Hawking says God’s not needed. So? « Shroud of Turin Blog
It’s impossible an effect without its cause.One would ask: From where the physical laws, including gravity, came from? The physical laws means order, and order means not causality, not chance.
Could the bright brain of this scientist at least be affected by his neurologic disease?