Stephen Jones has started reading N.T. Wright’s monumental, 800+ page book, The Resurrection of the Son of God. He wonders in his blog, Is N.T. Wright a Shroud pro-authenticist?
That Wright, a former Anglican Bishop of Durham, and a leading New Testament scholar, even mentioned the Shroud at all is amazing, given that Christian academics tend to ignore it, for fear of being thought of as belonging to the so-called `lunatic fringe’.
And that Wright referenced not a more well-known Shroud book, like one of Ian Wilson’s, but one that is less well known, by the Whangers, argues for Wright not only being a Shroud pro-authenticist, but having read widely in Shroud literature.
Tom Wright is one of my heroes. I’ve read many of his books including this one. It is probably the best modern-era book written on the subject. In my opinion, the reference to the shroud is casual, by-the-way, and unnecessary. I certainly don’t see how Stephen can assume that Tom Wright is a “a Shroud pro-authenticist” or has “read widely in Shroud literature.”
But it makes for a silly rumor that might spread on the Internet.
That’s right, the reference to the Shroud is indeed casual,by-the-way and unnecessary. It is no surprise. N.T.Wright has a strong anti-Catholic bias, he perhaps thought he could not do more than that when it came to the “Catholic” relic.
Maybe everyone should make up their own mind about NT Wrights anti-Catholic bias after reading NT Wright Responds to Richard Neuhaus in First Things, published by the Institute on Religion and Public Life, founded by Richard John Neuhaus, himself:
Or was there something else?
Richard John Neuhaus was a convert to Catholicism and he could detect bias when he saw it. N.T. Wright has shown anti-Catholic bias in some of his writings, and so have Alister McGrath and William Lane Craig.
Well, prejudices are something that people have to learn to live with, they do not die easily, they can be deeply ingrained, even irrational. We have some examples in history. Ulysses Grant also had an anti-Catholic bias,ignoring the fact that two of the top Civil War generals, Sheridan and Sherman, were Catholic. Queen Victoria was horrified when Lord Ripon, viceroy in India, Grand Master in freemasonry (!) became a Catholic. John Kennedy had a tough time explaining his Catholicism to the public to get himself elected.
We have other examples: Lady Diana Spencer’s family converted to Catholicism, they wanted to get even with the Queen.
I am Catholic (granted I converted, from a loose Anglican upbringing) and I think N.T. Wright is brilliant.
“Well, prejudices are something that people have to learn to live with, they do not die easily, they can be deeply ingrained, even irrational.”
And of course prejudices come in various assorted packages, with various targets, various ingrained attitudes, and can be either of the liberal or conservative brands. Following the excesses of Reformation reaction, euphemistically termed the Counter-Reformation, the Catholic Church seemed to adopt a defensive triumphalist position for some 350 years, a Church which a few of us pre-Vatican II Catholics remember only too well. Perhaps a few of us have still to catch up!
Something being done by archbishop Carlson in Saint Louis to combat prejudice, a problem Christians, of whatever denomination, should face:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/archbishop-carlson-fergus-st-louis-mass_n_5697987.html